vit_r: default (Default)
[personal profile] vit_r
  1	|=========================================================
  2	| PROTOCOL:
  3	
  4	        COMMAND:    Learn the analysis of agile processes 
  5	                        from the point of view of the deprecated engineering
  6	        ID:         [XXX (hidden for now) - vit_r ]
  7	        VERSION:    2020-12-23_1313
  8	        OWNER:      Vit-R, 2020
  9	
 10	|=========================================================
 11	| DOC:
 12	
 13	DESCRIPTION:    William Edwards Deming was the key expert during 
 14	                the transformation of Japanese industry towards quality
 15	                starting from 1950. The ideas he had presented
 16	                to the Japanese management were key sources 
 17	                of quality-oriented processes that are known 
 18	                in the European universities as myths about
 19	                Lean, Kanban, Toyota Production System, etc.
 20	                These myths were used by creating the modern Agile.
 21	
 22	                During the transformation of knowledge most important parts
 23	                of it were lost or intentionally damaged.
 24	                a) Try to find missing parts.
 25	                b) Try to analyze Agile from the point of view of
 26	                    the deprecated engineering.
 27	                [XXX (hidden for now) - vit_r ]
 28	


 29	|=========================================================
 30	| CONTEXT:
 31	
 32	WORK_MATERIAL:
 33	
 34	    1. (OPTIONAL)
 35	        William Edwards Deming, "Out of the Crisis", 
 36	        The MIT Press, 2000
 37	        ISBN 0-262-54115-7
 38	
 39	ASSERTS:
 40	
 41	    1.  At least 10 years of experience in any productive industry 
 42	            a)  Experience from university environments does not count
 43	            b)  Experience from individual projects     does not count
 44	            c)  Experience from projects in startups    must be divided 
 45	                                                            by 1.5
 46	
 47	    2.  At least  3 years of experience in any agile environment 
 48	            a)  Experience from university environments does not count
 49	            b)  Experience from projects with less than 3 people
 50	                    producing real work                 does not count
 51	            c)  Experience from projects with a ratio of unproductive workers  
 52	                    (managers, supervisors, motivators, etc.)
 53	                    to people producing any real work 
 54	                    greater than 4                      can be multiplied
 55	                                                            by 1.5
 56	
 57	    3.  By solving tasks in a group: 
 58	            a)  At least one person with qualified personnel experience
 59	            b)  A moderator with the authority to switch off (shut up) 
 60	                    participants with mythical experience
 61	                    (consultants, managers, university professors, etc).
 62	
 63	    4.  A possibility to take notes 
 64	            a)   (RECOMMENDED)  Paper and pen.
 65	            a.1) (OPTIONAL)     Any other possibility to write down 
 66	                                    textual information.        
 67	            b) Imaginary notes that are not written down do not count.
 68	
 69	    [XXX]
 70	
 71	    
 72	ADDITIONAL_INFORMATION:
 73	
 74	    1.  William Edwards Deming
 75	        a) https://deming.org/deming-the-man/
 76	
 77	    [XXX]
 78	
 79	|=========================================================
 80	| RESULTS:
 81	
 82	WORK_PRODUCTS:
 83	
 84	    1.  Written notes
 85	        NOTE:   The notes could be destroyed afterward.
 86	        RULES:
 87	            1.  Use your favorite language or English.
 88	
 89	KNOWLEDGE:
 90	
 91	    1.  Vocabulary of the deprecated engineering
 92	    2.  Understanding of base principles of Agile
 93	    3.  Understanding of true goals      of Agile
 94	    [XXX]
 95	
 96	SKILLS:
 97	    1.  Analysis of agile processes
 98	    2.  Understanding the roles in agile processes
 99	    2.  Psychological defense against rudimentary attempts
100	            to mix the deprecated engineering with Agile
101	
102	|=========================================================
103	| MAIN FLOW:
104	
105	1.  Perform standard preparations:
106	    a) Check that the WORK_MATERIAL is available 
107	        and the ASSERTS are fulfilled.
108	    b) Plan time for writing and thinking.
109	    [XXX]
110	
111	2.  Analyze the psychological definition of the agile quality.
112	    Quote:
113	            "Quality to the production worker
114	                means that his performance satisfies him,
115	                provides to him pride of workmanship."
116	    From:   
117	            William Edwards Deming, "Out of the Crisis", 
118	            Ch. 1 "Chain Reaction: 
119	                    Quality, Productivity, Lower Costs, Capture the Market",
120	            page 1.
121	
122	    a) Write down the quote in a form that defines the quality. 
123	    b) Remember and write down names of at least two agile engineers 
124	        who were (or are) satisfied with their work.
125	        NOTE: Use men because they tend to boost.
126	    c) For each mentioned agile engineer
127	        write down a list of results of which he was (or is) proud?
128	        NOTE: A result could be immaterial, fictive or completely imagined. 
129	    d) For each mentioned result 
130	        write down a list of features that were mentioned 
131	        by this engineer
132	        with clear signs of satisfaction, pleasure or excitement.
133	    e) Write down a condensed list of results.
134	        1) For all results of similar kinds
135	            write down one common classification name.
136	            NOTE: Do not use descriptive abstractions such as
137	                    junk, shit, etc. 
138	        2) If the list can be condensed further,
139	            repeat the process.
140	    f) Analyze the final list of results.
141	        This is the real production of Agile.
142	        Other work products are not important and can be replaced.
143	    g) Write down a condensed list of mentioned features.
144	        1) (RECOMMENDED)
145	            Convert features in measurable parameters 
146	                such as time, text volume, countable entities, etc.
147	        2) For all features of a similar kind
148	            write down one common classification name.
149	            NOTE: Consider the point of view of mentioned agile engineers
150	                    and use names they could agree on.
151	        3) If the list can be condensed further,
152	            repeat the process.
153	    h) Analyze the final list of features.
154	        This is the real definition of quality in Agile.
155	    i) For each mentioned engineer
156	        1) Write down a list of agile products
157	            this agile engineer produces.
158	        2) Write down a list of agile quality parameters
159	            this agile engineer uses in his work.
160	        3) Answer the following question:
161	            Why and for what this agile engineer was (or is) paid?
162	    j) (OPTIONAL)
163	        Cross-check the notes and [XXX].
164	    k) Remember your conclusions and never dare to mention them.
165	    l) (RECOMMENDED) Destroy the evidence.
166	        1) (RECOMMENDED) Burn the paper completely.
167	
168	    RESULTS:
169	        1. Notes on paper or (RECOMMENCED) ashes of the notes on paper.
170	        [XXX]
171	
172	3. Analyze the administrative definition of the agile quality.
173	    Quote:
174	            "Top management should publish a resolution
175	                that no one will lose his job
176	                for contribution to quality and productivity."
177	    From:   
178	            William Edwards Deming, "Out of the Crisis", 
179	            Ch. 2 "Principles for Transformation of Western Management",
180	            section "Elaboration on the 14 Points",
181	            subsection "1. Create constancy of purpose for improvement 
182	                        of product and service",
183	            page 26.
184	
185	    a) Write down the quote in a form that defines 
186	        the deprecated quality.
187	    b) Remember at least 3 cases when old-fashioned engineers
188	        had lost their jobs 
189	        or were warned that they could lose their jobs
190	        because of attempts to fulfill deprecated goals.
191	        NOTE: If you could not remember at least 3 such cases,
192	                your agile experience is not sufficient.
193	    c) For each case write down a short description.
194	        1) Write down a list of deprecated work products.
195	        2) Write down a list of deprecated quality parameters.
196	        3) Write down a list of agile products
197	            that are in conflict of deprecated work products.
198	        4) Write down a list of agile quality parameters
199	            that are in conflict of deprecated quality parameters.
200	        5) (OPTIONAL)
201	            Write down a list of explanations 
202	            that the agile managers had used
203	            to explain their administrative decisions
204	            or their warnings about administrative decisions.
205	            NOTE: Advanced agile managers do not explain
206	                    their administrative decisions.
207	    d) Write down a condensed list of deprecated work products.
208	        1) For all results of similar kinds
209	            write down one common classification name.
210	            NOTE: Use the terms that agile managers could understand;
211	                    rename scientific, engineering and mathematical terms
212	                    into words that agile managers do not fear.
213	        2) For each deprecated work product
214	            write a condensed list of conflicts with agile work products.
215	            NOTE: Use the form <term>-<verb>-<term>
216	                    with verbs such as "prevents", "stops", "shows", etc.
217	        3) If the list can be condensed further,
218	            repeat the process.
219	    e) Analyze the final list of deprecated work products.
220	        Remember, this work products are not important for Agile
221	        and must be abandoned for your success as an agile engineer.
222	    f) Write down a condensed list of deprecated quality parameters.
223	        1) For all quality parameters of similar kinds
224	            write down one common classification name.
225	            NOTE: Use the terms that agile managers could understand;
226	                    rename scientific, engineering and mathematical terms
227	                    into words that agile managers do not fear.
228	        2) For each deprecated quality parameter
229	            write a condensed list of conflicts 
230	            with agile quality parameters.
231	            NOTE: Use the form <term>-<verb>-<term>
232	                    with verbs such as "prevents", "stops", "shows", etc.
233	        3) If the list can be condensed further,
234	            repeat the process.
235	    g) Analyze the final list of deprecated quality parameters.
236	        Remember, this quality parameters are dangerous for Agile
237	        and must be abandoned for your success as an agile engineer.
238	    h) Write down a list of agile work products.
239	        1) Try to find out as much distinct names for products of one kind 
240	            as you can imagine.
241	        2) For each agile work product define importance as one of
242	            "important", "critical", and "very critical"
243	            on base of consequences
244	            that deprecated engineers have faced after attempts
245	            to damage them by trying to achieve deprecated quality.
246	    i) Write down a list of agile quality parameters.
247	        1) Try to find out as mush definitions 
248	            for each agile quality parameter
249	            as you can imagine.
250	            NOTE: Use vague not measurable descriptions, preferable adjectives.
251	        2)  For each agile quality parameter define importance as one of
252	            "important", "critical", "very critical", "very very critical"
253	            on base of consequences
254	            that deprecated engineers have faced after attempts
255	            to damage them by trying to achieve deprecated quality.
256	    j) Prepare an electronic lists of agile work products
257	        and agile quality parameters
258	        in a form that is suitable for generation of agile reports.
259	    k) Write down and remember most important agile work products 
260	        ("critical" and "very critical")
261	        and most sounding terms describing agile quality parameters
262	        for use in scrum meetings.
263	    l) Write down and learn for unconscious use most important 
264	        agile quality parameters ("very very critical") 
265	        for discussions with agile managers.
266	    [XXX]
267	
268	    RESULTS:
269	        1. (KEEP SECRET OR DESTROY)
270	            Written down lists of deprecated work products 
271	            and deprecated quality parameters.
272	        2. Written down list of agile work products.
273	        3. Written down list of agile quality parameters.
274	        4. Saved electronically and ready for use 
275	            templates for agile reports.
276	        [XXX]
277	    
278	[XXX (hidden for now) - vit_r ]
279	
280	|=========================================================
281	# EOF
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

vit_r: default (Default)
vit_r

April 2026

S M T W T F S
    12 3 4
56 7 891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 11th, 2026 06:42 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios