How you would explain previous bubble bursts that were not really driven by investment in consumer based assets (such as internet bubble and - i do not recall - but there was another 'bubble' between internet and the current one (?)
I assumed you agree with the author so you can expand. Of course I understand that your point of view might be not exactly reflecting the authors.
What you are describing is the symptom of the bubble (any bubble). When it becomes mass, and people who have no understanding of the matter are heavily engaged... this is usually one of the signs that it is nearing explosion.
Got it. For me the important part of LJ is that it is interactive. So when people post other's people materials - its not so much important for me whether they agree or not - but their thoughts about the subject they have referenced.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-05 01:04 pm (UTC)(such as internet bubble and - i do not recall - but there was another 'bubble' between internet and the current one (?)
no subject
Date: 2008-08-05 01:08 pm (UTC)By the way the Internet had become a bubble when the banks started offer courses "Investment strategies for the housewife"
no subject
Date: 2008-08-05 01:19 pm (UTC)What you are describing is the symptom of the bubble (any bubble). When it becomes mass, and people who have no understanding of the matter are heavily engaged... this is usually one of the signs that it is nearing explosion.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-05 01:29 pm (UTC)"A house is a good investment."
"Internet is a good investment."
"A bulb is a good investment." (If we consider the first crash)
If you do not reach masses, this is not a bubble but a trivial market overheat.
By the way there is no such thing as Web 2.0 bubble despite of all money burnt in this market.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-05 01:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-05 01:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-06 09:51 am (UTC)Тем более, что всё пишется "на ходу" без подготовки и раздумий.